`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Thursday, October 9, 2014

States have no right to curtail freedom of expression, apex court told

Ezra was charged last year for his involvement in the publication of a book ‘Allah, Love and Liberty’ written by Irshad Manji (pictured). – The Malaysian Insider pic, October 9, 2014.Ezra was charged last year for his involvement in the publication of a book ‘Allah, Love and Liberty’ written by Irshad Manji (pictured). – The Malaysian Insider pic, October 9, 2014.The Selangor Legislative Assembly has no power to enact laws which restrict the freedom of expression, the Federal Court heard today.
Lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, who represents ZI Publications Sdn Bhd and its director Mohd Ezra Mohd Zaid in a petition challenging the constitutionality of a Selangor religious enactment which restricts freedom of expression, submitted that Article 10 of the Federal Constitution provided that it was only the Parliament that could make laws to impose such restrictions in Malaysia.
"The states, including the Selangor government, had ceded their sovereignty to the federal government and the constitution following the Federation of Malaya Agreement in 1948," he said.
ZI Publications and Mohd Ezra, the son of former law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, are seeking a declaration from the Federal Court that Section 16 of the Shariah Criminal Enactment 1995 is invalid.
Mohd Ezra was charged last year for an offence under the section for his involvement in the publication of a book "Allah, Love and Liberty" written by Irshad Manji.
The Selangor Islamic authorities have taken the position that the book is contrary to Islamic canon law or Hukum Syara.
Under Section 16 of the enactment, any person who prints, publishes, produces, records, disseminates or possesses any book or document for sale which are contrary to the Islamic law is said to have committed an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding RM3,000 or a maximum two years’ jail or both, upon conviction.
In their petition, ZI Publications and Mohd Ezra named the Selangor government as respondent. The court had previously allowed the federal government and Selangor Islamic Religious Council as respondents.
Malik, who was assisted by Nizam Bashir, said the states could not enact laws that touched on fundamental liberties and this included freedom of expression.
He said since the offence of printing a prohibited publication was dealt with by the Printing Presses and Publication Act (PPPA), the Selangor enactment was null and void.
Selangor assistant legal advisor Ahmad Fuad Othman said the assembly had power to enact Shariah laws to protect the sanctity of Islam and ban religious publications that are detrimental to the religion.
“The state has the power to enact laws to protect the sanctity of the religion and this included punishing those who committed offences which went against the precepts of Islam," he added.
Under the constitution, Islamic affairs come under the purview of states, with the exception of the Federal Territories.
Federal Counsel Suzana Atan told the court that under the present scheme of the constitution, the Selangor legislative assembly's approval of the enactment was valid as states were allowed to make laws.
"The enactment is aimed to stop publications contrary to Islam," she said.
Mubashir Mansor, who represented the Selangor religious council, said the PPPA could not overide Section 16 of the enactment as the subject matter was about Islam.
Malik Imtiaz then said that the section was related to publications and clearly came within the jurisdiction of the PPPA.
"Why enact a law in the states when the federation has such power to deal with publications.  We contend that Section 16 (2) of the Selangor enactment is against Article 10," he added.
A five-man bench chaired by Tan Sri Raus Sharif reserved judgment.
- TMI

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.