`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 

10 APRIL 2024

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

THE BLINKERED APPROACH TO THE LAW BY THE FEDERAL COURT

HERE IS THE TRUTH OF THE CASE WHICH CJ ARIFIN ZAKARIA AND THE FEDERAL COURT WERE NOT INTERESTED IN AT ALL IN THEIR JUDGEMENT, JUST LIKE IN THE ALTANTUYA CASE, THE COURT WAS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE ISSUE OF MOTIVE FOR THE MURDER OF ALTANTUYA. As Datuk Zaid said, only a mad man will look for protected supply of C4 and blow to bits a young woman who just entered ithe country who he has never met before. Yet the Court ruled motive is not important enough to be pursued!! In this infamous so-called Sodomy II court case, it seems Anwar was prosecuted and sentenced for the part of fhe LAW which he was NOT charge. Instead , he was charged under the Penal Code Section 377B which IN FACR covers Saiful Bukhari as an abetting offender, BUT WHO WAS NEVER CHARGED. HERE IS THE THING FOR THE LAYMAN: How come the Apex court that primarily looks only at the LAW, had such a blinkered view of the appication of fhe LAW in this case? Instead it went over the details of challenged EVIDENCE and which had covered by the lower courts, especially by the Appeals Court and the High Court.? READ BELOW and draw your own conclusiion if this is not a travesty of justice. BAR COUNCIL SAYS ANOMALIES IN THE CHARGES AGAINST ANWAR SMELL OF PERSECUTION OF ANWAR BY POWERS-THAT-BE malaysiakini reports: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/288952 There are "glaring anomalies" in the sodomy charge against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim which fuel the perception that he is a victim of persecution, said Bar Council president Christopher Leong. In a press release today, Leong (right) explained that Anwar was charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code read together with Section 377A. Section 377B provides that provides that whosoever voluntarily commits the acts described in Section 377A shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping. "It is notable that Anwar was not charged under Section 377C of the Penal Code for forced sodomy or sodomy rape, although there may appear to have been some allegation of coercion made in the proceedings. "This has also given rise to questions or concerns as to why the complainant, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who was alleged to have been a participant in the act of sodomy, was not charged for abetment under sections 377A and 377B, read together with Section 109, of the Penal Code," said Leong. Strange world Given the fact that this law has rarely been used to charge anyone in court, and yet Anwar has been prosecuted and convicted twice for the an offence wherein the charge does contain elements of coercion, fuels suspicions further. "It is a strange world that we live in. These glaring anomalies fuel a perception that Anwar has been persecuted, and not prosecuted," said Leong. Yesterday, the five-member bench at the Federal Court, led by Chief Justice Arifin Zakaria, unanimous upheld Anwar's conviction and five year jail sentence. The judgment notes that Saiful had brought and used lubricant during the alleged act of sodomy but suggested that it doesn't mean the act was consensual. The Federal Court also noted that Saiful was not an "accomplice" in the act.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)